This photograph was one of those negatives, if you look at the previous post (Salmo Trutta), that was the negative I picked upon my initial look, and was the one I picked when I looked at the roll again, but this one, of the same trout has stuck in my head since then.
I am not sure which photograph I like more, or which is the better of the two; judging by the comments I have received on Flickr on both photographs there is no clear choice.
So what do you think? Was my original choice the better one or was the one that I have been living with all these months the better photograph? Or shall I go out and photograph more fish, this was the first trout I have actually photographed after all.
Please be specific, and give an honest critique of both photographs.
Thanks as always for reading, I look forward to hearing your thought about the photographs.